Paul:
Its good to see two articles related to Fatherhood so close together. We are indeed a marginalized species, especially white Anglo-Saxons who we see as buffoons on TV, in ads and at the movies. Those of us who are blind sided by family law as practiced by feminized judges know full well how important we are considered in the world of gender politics. We have wallets and are used as ATM's while perhaps seeing our children , if we don't have a vindictive ex, 4 days a month. Dads who have not run through the humiliation of family law (FLAW) don't yet know what is in store for them. Fathers are the bedrock of our civilization. The social problems, including the single largest source of child poverty, created by judges giving sole custody to moms in a 9-1 ratio, are pretty evident and study after study shows children with two parents in their lives do much better. A presumption of shared and equal parenting is needed on family breakdown to keep dads in their children's lives.
Thank you for your good work at McGill and your hands on involvement in showing Canadians that we men and fathers are important in more respects than sperm donors and wallets. I wanted to add that I love my children unconditionally but the manner in which a father demonstrates this is fundamentally different than a woman most of the time but not always.MJM
My father, who died two years ago, had a difficult but close and even intense relationship with me. From my perspective as a boy and young man, he seemed overly judgmental. I grew up thinking that I could never make the grade, never be good enough to satisfy his lofty expectations. And his standard for honourable manhood, which he applied to himself no less than to me, did seem unattainable. Worse, it seemed to me, his notion of manhood focused heavily on duty and sacrifice -- not things that most people, certainly not children, are eager to embrace. Worse still, perhaps, he expected me to learn skills that didn't interest me.
Dad played with me and took me to museums, sure, but he also tried to help me with my arithmetic homework -- and was visibly exasperated, night after night, by my inability to understand what he considered common sense.
To be blunt, I usually preferred my mother, who gave me uncomplicated and unconditional love. Dad confessed, many years later, that I had disappointed him at first. And I can see why.
I was an outsider for several reasons in childhood. Apart from anything else, I was both unwilling and unable to absorb prevalent but superficial (and ultimately both destructive and self-destructive) notions of masculinity. I had to invent myself, therefore, and I'm proud of my ability to do so. But it was Dad who first taught me to be independent -- that is, as I eventually understood, to think for myself but within a larger moral context. He taught me to become more fully human, in other words, not to embrace either conformity or "autonomy" (an overused and misused word these days).
Dad lived long enough to see me take my place in the world. I knew that he respected me as a scholar. One day, in the middle of some argument, he suddenly turned to me and said, "Paul, you're a learned man." Okay, I was much too old by then for those words to give me a sense of self-confidence. But we both realized immediately that this was a moment of profound fulfillment; a father had symbolically conferred manhood on his son. I never did learn arithmetic, but I had made him proud of me in other ways. This was my secular bar mitzvah.
Dad still blamed himself, however, for not pushing me hard enough to become more financially secure. Fortunately, we had time to talk about that. Having spent many years doing research in the humanities on manhood (including fatherhood), I told him that he had done exactly what every father needs to do. I didn't have to add that he had done so not by consciously adopting the approach of this or that expert but by subconsciously absorbing the legacy of human experience after countless generations.
Fathers, unlike mothers, must require their children to earn love -- respect, which is a form of love -- in order to leave home mature enough to give and receive it as adults. And fathers, unlike mothers, cannot measure their effectiveness adequately in terms of immediate emotional gratification. Spontaneous displays of affection from their children do not necessarily mean, after all, that fathers are doing what's best for them.
Young children know very little, in any case, about what their fathers do for them behind the scenes. Moreover, they often resent having to meet expectations or endure constant testing. As for fathers themselves, they find it hard to feel unconditional love for their children without always revealing it directly for fear of sending a double message: "I love you no matter what you do or don't do" versus "I love you for being worthy of love."
In short, fathering is inherently more complicated, more ambiguous, and more perilous (though not, of course, more important) than mothering. It requires a massive cultural effort to promote fathering and not merely to bribe or threaten fathers into providing material resources.
I'm dismayed, therefore, to find that our society seems hell-bent on undermining the culture of fatherhood (or whatever remains of that culture). My research with Katherine Young indicates that every person and every group, to have a healthy identity, must be able to make at least one contribution to society that is distinctive, necessary, and publicly valued. Now that women can take over two of the three historic functions of men, provider and protector (if necessary with the state's help), only progenitor remains. And to be a progenitor in any meaningful sense is to care for children in the ways that I've outlined here, not merely to contribute a teaspoonful of sperm or even a monthly cheque. Boys must know that society will indeed need them to make at least this one contribution.
For the time being, they don't. At best, in this age of Oprah Winfrey and sperm banks, the message is that fathers are assistant mothers and therefore luxuries. Boys now learn directly or indirectly, that there will be no room for them as men in family life and that they will therefore have no moral stake as men in the future of society. If that isn't an ominous sign, what is?
And yet, even now, most men do care for their children. Congratulations, then, to all the confused and beleaguered fathers out there for continuing to do what is often a thankless job.
Paul Nathanson is a research associate at McGill University's Faculty of Religious Studies and co-author of the books Spreading Misandry and Legalizing Misandry.
Comments (19)
Here's what readers have had to say so far.
Fathers get a raw deal quite often. Yes, there are those who pro-create without a thought as to how they will actually parent, but the majority are decent parents. The fact that until recently they had very limited legal parental rights when un-married is disgraceful.
I also think that men should be allowed more paternity leave, my husband hated going back to work when our son was merely 12 days old, I was lucky enough to work for a fantastic company allowing me 6 months paid leave, but I would have given up some of it to allow him time off. He's a wonderful father, his own dad left years ago and he is most definitely not a chip off the old block.
Dad's should be celebrated a bit more. The marketing spent on Mother's Day must be at least double that of Father's Day
- MrsM, Glasgow, UK, 22/6/2009 15:54
Report abuse
There was a programme on TV in which the children of British parents were exchanged with South African parents.
The British children were brought up in a laissez-faire manner to have no respect for adults or to use maners, and the Sout African children were brought up to respect elders and to have manners.
The South African children were well brought up and could not belive how much British children were allowed to get away with. Having been taught discipline, they had self-discipline and did not abuse their sudden increased licence.
However, the British children found it very difficult or impossible to deal with a disciplined environment and they tried but failed to behave as they did at home.
The South African children were stronger personalities far better able to cope with the change in lifestyles.
- Eric Legge, Ongar, Essex, 21/6/2009 23:59
Report abuse
Whats with all this feminist hating and blaming? I think blame is the problem here, how about people take responsibilty for their actions and realise a chld is for life and needs a stable home!!! Dont blame the feminists, they campaign to give women choices, not destroy families or belittle men!
- Sarah, Hull, 21/6/2009 16:07
Report abuse
Marriage used to be about a relationship based on the for 'richer or poorer'etc. Unfortunately there are some women around who move onto the next husband when finances become tight with little thought for the children. Some men have no values. Family values only exist within minorities these days.
The framework for most relationships these days centre on the amount of benefits on offer by the state.
Surely a mistake was made when the family allowance became child benefit. I believe the problems we see these days stems from that period.
A possible remedy could be achieved by simply reverting back to the family allowance. Benefits should only be received within this framework. If the allowance was capped it would make parents responsible for their offspring, not the state.
Bring back the married mans allowance!
I'm sure my thoughts would not be popular with many, but sometimes the medicine required to save the patient is distasteful.
- Gerald, Finchley, 21/6/2009 16:01
Report abuse
Mr Cable is the only true polotition left in this country. He tries to see from both sides of the argument and it not afraid to say where it is failing. It is a shame that we cannot have a person of this intelligence as our Prime Minister. I am sure is he was in the running for PM he would win by a landslide.
- Hugh, Leeds, 21/6/2009 13:09
Report abuse
I love father's day. My mother left when I was thirteen, and my dad raised me and my two brothers as a single parents for several years till he remarried. Most of my friends thought this was bizarre - not that we were a single parent family, but that we were with my dad. And they couldn't work out how I, as a teenage girl growing up, would be able to talk to. Until they meet my dad, and realise how close I am to him - and then they all come away saying he'd the coolest dad they know. Father's are a hugely important part of a family, and it should be recognised - especially because not all mother's are as caring as we would like.
- Kate, Coventry, 21/6/2009 12:25