Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Victim feminist organization in USA mounts campaign to become enablers of child abuse called Parental Alienation

Fathers & Families a Children's, Parent's and Dad's advocacy group in the United States  has been spearheading a campaign to get Parental Alienation into the ongoing research for the upcoming revision of DSM-V ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the American Psychological Association’s reference work for determining whether a person has certain disorders. You can participate by clicking here. The National Association of Women (NOW) a strident,  well funded Marxist Victim Feminist group is playing the gender card on it and mounting a counter claim.

This is excellent for a number of reasons. The first one is this emotional abuse of children is not gendered. There is ample history of it before the courts and in studies to clearly show the non-gendered nature of it. Both moms and dads do it but because it is associated with custody more often than not, and moms in Canada get physical custody in 90% of cases (in the USA 86%) it has more frequency with moms.  Either way it is terrible emotional abuse of children and the target parent.  It will call NOW out to have to explain its posture, which will be the old canards that women are victims of abuse and it is used by men as a court room tactic to continue the abuse and get custody.  Given Lesbians are doing it I wonder what NOW calls that. Wait, I think they have invented something else to rationalize it and I can't wait to hear what it is.  If you have contact with NOW let me know the term they use and their explanation.

Another important factor is related to mendacity and that is how NOW is able to still attract revenue from the gullible politicians to keep them going.  According to NOW women do not abuse. They are benign and only respond defensively or because of hormone imbalances. In other words they are completely controlled by the Patriarchy that nebulous and invisible force of masculinity that rules everything.  The argument is as fallacious today as it was when created but the propaganda machine this organization has works wonders. It matters not that social science shows females initiate violence more than men, lesbians have a higher rate, mutual aggression between genders is about equal and single moms are the largest group to kill or maltreat children on a national scale in the USA and in Australia.  When they start the same kind of campaign ranting on without any scientific proof about Parental Alienation large numbers of credible people in the Social Sciences, Legal, as well as target male and female parents can speak out against it with facts.

Let the debate begin and lets get NOW out in the open to explain their case. Lets get a person to person debate going with people like Glenn Sacks, Mark Rudov and many others with these feminists.  I'm certainly willing to get involved in a forum to bring their house of cards crashing down. It may well be the turning point of the gender wars where if we make them look like the mendacious purveyors of mythology they really are we can get help for men who also suffer from Domestic abuse.


 This is the Action Alert to counter the Fathers & Families campaign under the auspices of  NOW’s Tracy Simmons:
I am writing you, the leaders of various groups that represent battered women, for your help in one of the most important matters we will address this year. The American Psychiatric Association is considering adding Parental Alienation to the Diagnosticians book, which would legitimize this legal tactic into a real disorder.

Parental Alienation Syndrome has now morphed into Parental Alienation Disorder thanks to the fathers’ rights organizations who are wildly pushing this through, and why wouldn’t they? It benefits the abuser and discriminates against the victims of abuse, which are overwhelmingly women.


This gender specific, abuse excuse, junk science can not be allowed to enter into the scientific community as there is nothing scientific about a syndrome/disorder whose only symptoms are a uterus, divorce papers, and bruises. I ask that you all to take action against legitimizing this outrageous theory by e-mailing the APA and asking your groups to do the same.



Lets ensure we stay involved and counter these deniers of severe emotional abuse of children and in so doing clearly show they are enablers of child abuse not protectors of children.  They have only one thing in mind. The continuation of the entitlement system in place for feminists and for them, as always, the end justifies the means.

Fathers & Families has a very good FAQ page on Parental Alienation here

Monday, March 8, 2010

Are Vancouver and Delta police acting like Jackbooted Brown Shirts?

You may have heard of the term FemiNazi.  That term applies to mendacious propaganda put out by feminist groups, which vilifies without merit all men as abusers and all women as victims. They use false research and information to support this contention. It can involve false allegations including both physical and sexual abuse of women and children. It is designed solely to ruin men's lives and continue the tax supported entitlement system passed by testicularly challenged politicians. Jack Layton, Ontario Premier  McGuinty, Chris Bentley, AG, Ontario are three examples that come to mind.  It is ironic Layton now has Prostate Cancer so in his case it is more than a metaphor. He is Canada's leading "Girly Man" and political opportunist.

Many DV shelters are the HQ's for this and they actively advise moms and women to bring about allegations of abuse. Lawyers are clever at it couching it in terms of areas where certain behaviours may enhance the getting of permanent custody.  With moms, who get 90% of sole custody, it works well and has for years. It is so embedded in the legal culture that training provided to Judges by the National Judicial Institute incorporates the work of such feminist sycophants as Peter Jaffe, a teacher at the University of Western Ontario. Jafffe turns out very one-sided reports which, with pretty much 100% accuracy, always support the claim of a one sided gendered abuse. The London Police Chief Faulkner, worships at the feet of Jaffe and he has created a corporate culture in London, Ontario similar to Vancouver.

It is no accident Family Court Judges across this vast nation make such consistent decisions favouring moms.  Man is bad - woman is benign.  The real world tells a different story with DV as equally mutual and in the majority of cases initiated by the female.

 One can see the outcome of this culture which is obviously embedded in some Police Services as well. The two thugs, who are supposed to serve and protect as Police Officers, acted like Nazi Goons and what they did to this family is unforgivable.  Are they fired and charged with criminal assault yet?  Has anyone seen a mug shot of them? In fact, has anyone seen their pictures at all?

It seems clear the Delta Police are as corrupt as the Vancouver Police Service and have botched the investigation.  The war on men continues and this is only the tip of the iceberg. Everyday across Canada innocent men are thrown into jail under similar circumstances. The only difference is you don't hear about it. In this case the incompetent thugs got the wrong person.  Even if they had found the right house only an allegation had been made which is not proof of guilt.


The bottom line message that needs repeating over and over is Domestic Violence is not a zero sum problem only applying to women. It is a human and family problem. It is time to change the paradigm and it’s time to stop the political correctness including Nazi style police actions. .  In Canada DV is pretty much equal between men and women with females actually precipitating it at a higher rate than men.  Why do they do this? Simple - because they can - men seldom hit back.  Many men need services as well and its time to provide it rather than just a single gender.

Feminism in this day and age is the true "F" word and sooner or later men will stop "sucking" this up and find their family jewels to become a potent political force.MJM
 

















Yao Wei Wu is due to return to hospital to assess damage to his eye.

Photograph by: Handout, Ming Pao newspaper (www.mingpaovan.com)

A Vancouver man who was mistakenly beaten by two police officers says Delta police have botched their investigation of the incident.

In the early hours of Jan. 21, Yao Wei Wu, 44, was woken up, dragged out of his house on Lanark Street and beaten by two police officers in plain clothes.

Wu, a tiling subcontractor, suffered fractures to his face and injuries to his legs and back. His eyes were swollen shut. His wife, Chi Nan Man, who was present during the assault, says she has suffered serious psychological trauma.

Vancouver police subsequently apologized, saying the officers had been called to a domestic-violence incident but had got the wrong address.

Police Chief Jim Chu asked the Delta police to conduct an “independent” investigation into the matter.
But Wu says he is unhappy with the Delta Police Department.

In a statement of claim filed in B.C. Supreme Court, Wu says that although investigators were quickly able to ascertain that officers Nicholas Florkow and Bryan London had perpetrated a serious assault, they’ve breached their duty and conducted a negligent investigation.

The suit says Delta police failed to arrest and detain the two officers, failed to interview them and failed to obtain physical evidence of the trespass and assault, including fingerprints, blood and tissue samples, DNA evidence and photos.

It says Delta police failed to gather physical evidence for tests, failed to interview material witnesses and failed to prepare a report to Crown counsel in a timely way, or at all, and failed to recommend charges be laid.
“The Wu family is very dissatisfied with the investigation of this matter,” says a statement released by Cameron Ward, Wu’s lawyer.

“They feel that charges should have been laid weeks ago and that the men who beat Mr. Wu up are receiving preferential treatment because they are police officers. They don’t believe the Canadian justice system should work this way.”

The statement says the Wu family was asked to file a complaint with the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner but they have no confidence with that process, because it involves police investigating police.

“The OPCC is staffed almost entirely with former police officers who must naturally be uncomfortable finding fault with their former colleagues.”

The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified general and special damages as well as aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages.

No statement of defence has been filed by the defendants, which include the city of Vancouver, the two Vancouver cops and the Delta police.

Vancouver police referred questions to Delta police. A spokesman for the Delta police said there would be no comment and added that he couldn’t say when the investigation will be complete.

A statement of claim contains allegations that have not been proven in court.

kfraser@theprovince.com

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Manology: Exploring 21st Century Masculinity



I send spring greetings! I write to let you that my on-going course for men, Manology: Exploring 21st Century Masculinity, will be starting a 12 week spring run on March 11th.  Please feel free to spread the word through your networks.  All men 19 years and older are welcome.  Women - in addition to encouraging you to support men to consider checking out Manology, women will be welcomed as participants on May 6th, in our co-gender dialogue session!!  Here are the Manology course details below: 

Course Description:

Manology is an on-going, drop-in course for men 19 years and older, of all stages, backgrounds, orientations, and ethnicities. It is delivered by a diverse team of educators and facilitators with a wide range of knowledge and skills to share. Men are celebrated and supported, and are offered insight, experiences, and conversations on the physical, mental, and spiritual journey of manhood. It’s for men who are interested in exploring male identity and are ready to encourage other men to do the same. Dates: Thursdays, 7:30 - 9:45 pm, March 11 - May 27 Cost: $12 drop-in, $10 for registered men. Site: Roundhouse Community Centre, downtown Vancouver.

To check out upcoming themes and presenters, or for more info, please visit our website: www.masculinity21st.wordpress.com  
Manology has garnered solid attendance since it's beginning last Sept, as well as media interest.  Print interviews can be found at:
http://www.davidhatfield.ca/media.php   As well, Manology will be featured in an interview on Joy 10 TV  that will air March 20th on a show called "Winds of Change". 



-     -     -     -     -       
David Hatfield, Leadership Consultant & Facilitator 
e: david@davidhatfield.ca
w: www.davidhatfield.ca 
p: 604-255-3597

skype: davidbhatfield

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Mom Tried to get a contractor to "Whack" dad but got caught

Here is a case of Parental Alienation taken to the extreme. Mom wants Dad whacked. The mom's lawyer is spouting the usual drivel about the woman actually being the victim but somehow I think the facts are probably different. Hopefully the lawyer will get his butt sued for slander. They will say anything as long as they are getting paid.  What do courts think they are doing by telling a dad who can't afford it to pay $11,000.00 a month for child support. Courts create far more adversary than not and where was this "poor" mom who wanted dad "whacked" getting the $20,000.00 if she was so desparate.MJM




 

Updated: Sat., Mar. 6, 2010, 4:29 PM

Long Island mom got a cheap 'hit'

Last Updated: 4:29 PM, March 6, 2010

Posted: 2:47 AM, March 6, 2010

An upper-crust Long Island housewife accused of hiring a hit man to off her hubby lamented she could only afford to maim him -- but then was thrilled to learn she could whack him at a bargain-basement price of just $20,000, authorities said yesterday.

That's the stone-cold, cost-calculating mentality of sick soccer mom Susan Williams, 43, who allegedly hired an undercover cop this week to whack her husband of 21 years. She was held yesterday on $1 million bail.
The twisted plot didn't surprise her long-suffering spouse, Peter Williams.

His lawyer said the woman "tortured" the poor man with sick lies during their divorce in a grab for their million-dollar Garden City home and other cushy assets.

She even allegedly turned their four kids -- ages 11 to 19 -- against him.

"I can't believe it took her this long" to try to kill Peter, said his divorce lawyer, Nancy Dreeben.

"She's a desperate woman, and she will just do whatever she needs to do to get what she wants. She's a narcissist."

Dreeben said Susan admitted she cheated on her husband during their marriage -- even bedding the real-estate lawyer for whom she worked before he fired her.


Susan stole marital assets and then, after filing for divorce in 2008, falsely accused Peter -- a 46-year-old fence-company owner -- of physical violence against their kids and of forcing her to have deviate sex, Dreeben said.

Those claims were never substantiated and Susan a year later even willingly agreed to allow Peter visitation rights, the lawyer noted.

Peter Williams, 46, a Baldwin resident who is now working to get custody of his kids, said, "I am thankful that the person that my wife sought to help in hiring a hit man had the decency to contact the appropriate authorities -- otherwise I would probably be dead."

But yesterday, Susan's lawyer painted a different picture, accusing the husband of being abusive and a deadbeat dad.

"There's a long history of problems, physical and sexual," in the marriage, attorney Stanley Kopilow said. "He's not a nice guy."


Susan's dad, Brendan Galligan, sobbed outside his Long Island home while defending his daughter.

"She had no money, and he wasn't paying for anything. She was having a very hard time," Galligan said.

"We tried to help her as best we could as parents, but now this happens," he said. "It's totally devastated my wife and me."


Dreeben admits Peter has failed to pay court-ordered monthly child support of $11,000 because he can't afford it.

She also said that sky-high amount was set by a judge after Susan lied about the couple's finances.


Susan was busted Thursday after authorities secretly recorded her negotiating with the "hit man" -- actually an undercover cop.

Susan had previously asked an unidentified man for help in arranging the attack on her husband, Nassau County DA Kathleen Rice said. That man contacted the DA.

"Initially it was, 'I want him hurt,' " Rice said. "Then it became, 'I want him gone.'

"She didn't think she could afford [a murder]. She didn't realize it was so cheap. When the $20,000 amount was thrown out" by the purported hit man, "she then made it clear what she wanted him to do," the DA said.

After learning the price, Susan allegedly forked over a $500 down payment as well as her husband's photo and personal information, but no more money changed hands.

Additional reporting by Selim Algar and Murray Weiss
kieran.crowley@nypost.com
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/wife_got_cheap_hit_e4N44gsg5gaxvCKupqDadL   

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Respectful relationships or 'boy-bashing'?

Medianet Logo AAP Logo
 Medianet Release


05 Mar 2010 5:00 AM - Respectful relationships or 'boy-bashing'?

One in 
Three Campaign
Media release - for immediate release - Friday March 5th 2010

Respectful relationships or ‘boy-bashing’?

Respect is a two-way street – but Wednesday’s announcement of Federal funding from the $9.3 million allocation to “respectful relationship” programs appears designed to target only boys as potential perpetrators of violence in relationships. Yet Australian research shows that girls are as likely to practice dating violence as boys – and that violence by girls towards boys is seen as more acceptable than is violence by boys against girls.

University of Western Sydney researcher Micheal Woods said, “By appearing to focus upon gender as the cause of relationship violence and abuse, these programs ignore the internationally accepted evidence that other causes play a much larger part. The social determinants that can lead to abusive relationships include social disadvantage, drug and alcohol abuse, mental health issues, and inadequate conflict management and affect regulation skills.”

“The approach behind this campaign is at odds with the Prime Minister’s preference for evidence-based policies – this roll-out of funding appears to support biased gender ideology, not social good. The denigration of boys as belonging to a “violent” gender – and the implicit approval for violence by girls against boys – undermines the intent of reducing violence in relationships,” said Mr Woods.

Melbourne psychologist, Dr Elizabeth Celi, said, “Do we want our young girls thinking that slapping a male friend or boyfriend, throwing objects at him, kicking or scratching him with her nails is OK? Research clearly shows that females as well as males, at school and university age, are violent toward their partners and schoolmates. Why are we staying silent about this issue? Young women saying ‘Stop!’ to their girlfriends slapping or verbally abusing their male friends or boyfriends is just as important a message to teach our kids.”

Anti-violence campaign One in Three spokesperson Greg Andresen said, “Respectful relationships education is an essential part of the school curriculum. However, conflating ‘respectful relationships’ and ‘violence against women’ implies that disrespect in relationships only leads to males abusing females. Why is the government ignoring the 50 per cent of relationships in which girls physically and psychologically abuse their boyfriends? We are concerned that these ‘respectful relationships’ programs are really just boy-bashing exercises in disguise.”

Data released today by One in Three reveals that:
  • 21 per cent of physical violence between dating partners of university age during 2005-6 in Australia was perpetrated by females only, 14 per cent by males only and 64.9 per cent was mutual violence (where both partners used violence against each other) [source]
  • Young males and females aged 12 to 20 were equally likely to have experienced domestic violence or forced sex by a partner [source]
  • Young people were just as likely to have seen Mum hit Dad as they were to have seen Dad hit Mum [source]
  • 25 per cent of young people agreed with the statement “When a girl hits a guy it’s really not a big deal.” While males hitting females was seen by virtually all young people surveyed to be unacceptable, it appeared to be quite acceptable for a girl to hit a boy [source]
  • Young males were more likely than young females to have experienced bullying, punch-ups between people at school/college, drunken fights in pubs/clubs and racial violence [source]
  • Young females were more likely than young males to have experienced rape/sexual assault & ‘bitching’ [source].
The One in Three Campaign aims to raise public awareness of the existence and needs of male victims of family violence and abuse; to work with government and non-government services alike to provide assistance to male victims; and to reduce the incidence and impacts of family violence on Australian men, women and children.

MEDIA CONTACTS

Micheal Woods, Adjunct Fellow, University of Western Sydney, 0414 710 696 or m.woods@uws.edu.au
Dr Elizabeth Celi, Psychologist and Author, 0413 338 237 or info@qualityliving.com.au
Greg Andresen, One in Three spokesperson and Senior Researcher, 0403 813 925 or info@oneinthree.com.au


Please see the following files attached:
[One_in_Three_Media_Release_RR10.pdf]

Distributed by AAP Medianet

JN#:647965 E-G

   Contact Us © Australian Associated Press, 2008  

Woman charged with killing husband is lobbyist for a Domestic Violence Group

Here's an interesting case of a lobbyist for a Domestic Violence group in Georgia, USA who was also a hit person and "whacked" her husband. These groups are hypocritical in the extreme and many just plain corrupt using mendacity to keep the tax dollars flowing. This is a new twist where an operative gets caught not only in a lie but for DV Homicide.MJM


The Atlanta Journal-Constitution


5:25 p.m. Wednesday, March 3, 2010

A 45-year-old woman, charged with ending a domestic dispute by killing her 26-year-old husband of five days, is a registered lobbyist for a group fighting domestic violence.

Arelisha Bridges was ordered held without bond in the Fulton County Jail. She is scheduled for a preliminary hearing later this month on charges of felony murder, murder, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

Officials said Bridges claimed she was unemployed. But records show she is a lobbyist for an organization called the National Declaration for Domestic Violence Order; its Web site says the group is pushing legislation to create a database of those convicted of sex crimes or domestic abuse.

Usually an accused felon will appear at a preliminary hearing a day later, but Bridges' hearing was within hours of the shooting death of Anthony Rankins. Officials said the court appearance was moved up because of the unusual circumstances around the crime.

Witnesses told police that Bridges was wearing a nightgown and a shower cap as she argued with Rankins on the sidewalk on North Avenue near West Peachtree Street around 10:45 p.m. Monday.

And moments later, witnesses said, they heard shots. They said she then "calmly walked away."
A MARTA police officer stopped her as she was getting into her car, perhaps to return to her home nearby on Centennial Olympic Park Drive.

According to Atlanta police, Bridges told investigators that she and Rankins had been dating for a few months and were just married on Feb. 24.

Bridges' group isn't among the prominent domestic violence lobbying groups in Georgia, said Kirsten Rambo, the executive director of the Georgia Commission on Family Violence.
 
"This is the first I've heard about that organization," Rambo said. "I certainly couldn't say if they were legitimate or not," she said, adding, "It's certainly a new name to me."

Bridges has filed sparse lobbying expenses, according to State Ethics Commission records. So far this year, she's reported spending $20 -- for parking while lobbying for the abuse database.

-- Staff writer Mike Morris contributed to this article.