New Fathers 4 Justice ~ Controversial dads' group plans cathedral protest

We support you across the pond in Canada. Lets put the Dad back in Christmas and the Church in the spotlight for sitting on its hands.

Maternalism seems to take precedence over needing a father yet it was apparently a father that created the universe according to the COE. MJM

Share with :	Close
del.icio.us	Digg
Facebook	reddit
StumbleUpon	Twitter

Fathers’ rights campaigners planning a protest at Canterbury Cathedral have refused to rule out climbing up the ancient building.

In the past, members of New Fathers 4 Justice dressed a superheroes have managed to clamber on a series of high-profile buildings and unfurl banners demanding the right for father to see their children following a divorce or separation.

A source inside the controversial group, which will mount the demo on December 12, said: “We are still working out details. The final strategy is being decided.”

Police have warned they will react accordingly if any one climbs on the cathedral.

The Cathedral’s history goes back to 597AD and it is currently running a £50 million fundraising appeal to tackle serious structural problems facing the ancient building.

But ‘Jason’, the group’s South East co-ordinator said the demo is not a protest against the Church of England.

He said: “In fact we want them to do more to help fathers who are being cut off from their children through no fault of their own.

“Most people know this is not fair, yet it seems the Church and Government simply turn a blind eye to these men and dismiss their situation as unimportant.

“The synod has not debated the family and the breakdowns of the unit since 1991, which is frankly shocking.

“And the Government seems to also be ignoring these men. In many cases they have done nothing wrong, yet are told by mothers and the courts that they have no right to see their own children. For many, this is a wrench that is almost impossible to bear.”

The group is now organising what it is calling a “high profile protest” at the Cathedral for the first time.

Previously members have scaled the Royal Courts of Justice, Tower Bridge, thrown purple flour bombs at Tony Blair during Prime Minister's Questions at the House of Commons, and climbed onto the roof of Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman's house.

Jason said: “We want to put father back into Christmas. That is our slogan for this demonstration, and it makes so much sense.

“Christmas is a time for families, so it is all the more harder for dads to be apart from their children at this time of year.

“We know there are many fathers in Kent who are in this position and we would urge them to attend this protest, preferably dressed in a Santa outfit to drive the point home to the Church.

“We want to get our message across and slowly chip away at the establishment in the hope they will one day see how serious this is for so many people.”

New Fathers 4 Justice said the Church of England was showing a lack of leadership on modern-day family life, divorce and protection of young children's rights to both parents and extended families.

It warns it can’t rule out direct action at religious services.

Fathers are also part of the church flock that need help, yet the Church fails to speak out about a problem that causes so much pain, said Jason.

He said: “Children need contact with both a mother and a father and with extended families to provide the love, care, nurturing and discipline necessary for a happy childhood.

“We as dads and grandparents love our children and just wish to spend time with them but the present system breeds demoralisation in the home and workplace, compounded with further damage to even the sanest person's mental health.

“The Church of England and it representatives must stop ignoring the consequences of family breakdown.”

A spokesman for the Cathedral said: “I think there are better ways to make their protest. The courts and government control these things.

“It’s also not true the Church has turned its back on this.

“On February 12 this year, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams spoke at the House of Lords’ Children: Good Childhood Inquiry Report Debate where he backed the debate which called attention to the publication of the Good Childhood Inquiry report.”

POSTED: 28/11/2009 13:00:00

http://www.kentnews.co.uk/kent-news/Controversial-dads_-group-plans-cathedral-protest-newsinkent30348.aspx?news=local

In OZ ~ The clock ticks, but the hands the hands stay still

I made this comment on the newspaper site. http://fwd4.me/5jC. Ozzy papers are odd in that they offer you the choice to make comments but frequently they never appear for whatever reason the editor has. This is currently the case on this story. Its a bit silly particularly if it is such a heartbreaking story as this. Maybe the maternalists (female supremacists who believe only moms have child rearing capability) and slime anyone who thinks otherwise) were sending in hateful comments. They are infamous for that.


I am one of many in the international community on watch with you. I know the terrible loneliness to have your child kidnapped emotionally and physically. Abduction is one of the worst forms of Parental Alienation and can have life lasting impact on an innocent child. Over Christmas the feelings become magnified beyond what mere mortals can comprehend into an agony of deep introspection. It passes and makes you stronger but it still hurts day in and day out.

Unlike a death in the family where the grieving may recede with time yours does not. It is with you each and every day with similar intensity and it wears heavily on your soul and your health. I wish you well my fellow dad and know this - I have been in your dark valley and I have gazed at the abyss of hell without my children. You have my best wishes and with you I hope the light at the end of the tunnel gets a little brighter as the days pass. It can, against what appear to be impossible odds, become more luminescent. I know this from experience.

Be with other friends and family at Christmas. It is not a substitute but it will help.MJM

• By Michelle Cazzulino
• From: The Daily Telegraph
• November 24, 2009 12:00AM

Counting the seconds ... Ken Thompson at in his son Andrew's room at Hunters Hill / Pic: Alan Pryke Source: The Daily Telegraph

THIRTY-one days, 11 hours, 44 minutes and 13 seconds. Eight seconds. Five seconds. Two seconds.

There's a certain depressing predictability about the countdown to Christmas, which kicks into high gear at this time of year: you know, for example, that some twit will refuse to hang decorations on the basis that it might offend a religious minority and that such a stance will have the sole effect of annoying everybody equally.

The first cards will arrive, smugly written and sent, proving that someone, somewhere, has nothing better to do than punch out 500 soul-destroyingly dull words about how Aunt Mildred was shipped off to a nursing home in May and cousin Werner took up the euphonium in July.

And then there's that stupid ad on the radio, reminding you at least four times an hour that you need to get your order in now if you want your couch delivered ahead of the festive season.

And so, with feverish visions of a sack-wielding Santa getting crushed to death by a couple of sofa-toting deliverymen, you'll rush to the phone, only to realise that you're panicking for nothing because you don't need a couch.

In the midst of it all, it's easy to forget that there are people who, through sheer miserable circumstance, are divorced from the kind of temporary madness that overtakes the rest of us.

Currently, Ken Thompson can also measure his life by days, hours and seconds, only in his case, there's absolutely no chance of respite coming along in the form of a credit card bill and a handful of broken new years' resolutions.

For 19 hellish months, he has been without his only child - a six-year-old named Andrew who was aged just four when his mother Melinda spirited him to an undisclosed overseas location.

Last December, Mr Thompson successfully petitioned the Family Court to lift a ban on identifying Andrew in the media, allowing him to go public with the details of his search for his son.

In another lifetime, he was the state's deputy fire chief, but three months ago he finally took a leave of absence, acknowledging that every moment spent not looking for Andrew felt like a gross betrayal of his boy.

With no idea as to where to start looking, he has pinned his hopes on a Find Andrew website and the resources of the international online community, which has rallied to support his exhaustive efforts.

In doing so, Mr Thompson has laid bare the raw details of his life.

At times, the strain has been overwhelming.

He has been examined by psychiatrists, submitted to polygraph testing and been admitted to hospital suffering double pneumonia.

Two months ago, his lung capacity was just 15 per cent - doctors warned him that if he didn't start taking care of himself, the consequences would almost certainly be fatal.

Every milestone brings fresh agony.

Statistically, Mr Thompson was told, children in Andrew's situation are likely to be returned within 12 weeks of their abduction. On that date last year, he wrote an email to international authorities to thank them for their continued efforts.

He cried as he hit the button to send it.

This morning, as with every other, he will get up and check his phone and his emails, praying that something will have changed overnight, spurred by the memory of his tiny son's hugs and the hope that one day, Andrew will be returned to him.

In the meantime, as the clock ticks on, he remains prisoner to a timetable he has no control over.

"This Christmas . . . I really don't know. Honestly, I'm just doing things day-to-day," he said yesterday.

"I can't plan ahead because I don't know how I'll be feeling from one day to the next. I'm living in limbo. It's just this ongoing, horrible trauma of not knowing where my child is - and my wife - and it's with me 24 hours a day.

"It's a really difficult feeling to describe. It's just constant uncertainty, incredible stress and anxiety and just not being able to move forward. My whole life is on hold until I find Andrew."

Anyone with information about the location of Andrew or his mother is asked to contatc the Australian Federal Police on 6126 7777.

Anyone who recognises the mother is asked not to approach her but to contact the AFP on the above number which applies in all states and territories.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/the-clock-ticks-but-the-hands-the-hands-stay-still/story-e6frezz0-1225802386249

There is an angry core of Australian men who use cyberspace as the latest forum to unload on how women have done them wrong

My observations left on the newspaper site but may not be published.

My goodness David you are a genuine Feminist. So glad to make your acquaintance. Do you exaggerate that "all" the men who complain are "angry"? Do you resort to hyperbole to defend the honour of feminists when you state "Setting aside the fact that there's no such thing as an over-exaggeration,..."

Well Mr. Penberthy you have been co-opted and you clearly have no clue at all about the wrath wrought by the opposite sex when they decide their partner is deserving of let me see where do I start...oh yes... verbal abuse which becomes at first annoying, then tiring and then just plain abusive. Do you not think men have feelings and their self esteem can be debilitated by constant emotional tirades? Then there is the matter of emptying the bank accounts and maxing out the credit cards. Then there is the use of weaponry such as 4.5' wooden rake handles which can kill. Did I mention getting beat on the head when not looking with a 10 lb water jug? How about your spouse robs, through fraud, your employer and ruins your career and does the same thing in a family business ruining the business.

You have not done any research to write this column and that is too bad but then its typical of those with your "manly" mindset. You criticize others for not providing citations but you argue the other way without citing any thing of merit either. You believe men are invincible and I'm not exaggerating (sarcasm). You really do not have a clue about the level of abuse women are capable of within a partnership and we haven't even gotten to emotional abuse through the alienation of children. Have you explored the abuse of children at the hands of females in your country. You should and you will be surprised to learn they are the leading gender in that respect. That is the same in the USA where single moms lead the pack for both maltreatment and killing of their children. It gets worse when you add in her new boyfriend.

In most western countries Domestic Violence is pretty much equal between genders. In my country of Canada 7% of females and 6% of males are impacted according to our lead Statistics gathering government agency. We live in a world suffused with mythological statistics that only women are victims and much of it is propaganda or gathered incorrectly. Its a pity.MJM



White Ribbon Day in forum's sight

• David Penberthy
• From: Herald Sun
• November 26, 2009 12:00AM

Ambassador: Entertainer Andrew O'Keefe spreads the White Ribbon Day message.

A few weeks ago we ran a column on The Punch website, examining their emergence. The piece documented

how even those columns with the most innocent subject matter, such as breast cancer, maternity leave, child care

or body image become a vehicle whereby crotchety men can bemoan the apparent neglect of men's health issues, the economic pressures faced by single dads and the raw deal they get from the courts.

The article had the unsurprising effect of attracting, well, an angry core of Australian men who use cyberspace as a forum to unload on how women have done them wrong.

There was a depressingly pertinent example of this mindset this week and it's worth pinging the perpetrators over it, as it demonstrated all the nonsensical self-pity of the men-are-victims-too brigade.

Related Coverage

• Editorial : Solemn promise

Bizarrely enough, the target of their anger this time was White Ribbon Day - you know, the wildly radical outfit that believes it's wrong to hit women, which argues that the overwhelming majority of victims of physical violence in the home are women, and that women are more likely to be sent to hospital or killed as a result of domestic violence.

Yes, the same apparently sinister organisation that believes it is appropriate that boys and young men should have their thinking challenged at a deliberately early age on the subject of how they treat girls and young women.

Let me be clear. The White Ribbon Day people argue those things because they are actually true. They advocate education programs for young blokes because the best way to address bad thinking is to nip it in the bud.

But it was White Ribbon Day that copped a clip over the ear from the Men's Rights Agency, which is the closest thing we have to an American-style woe-is-us men's movement in Australia.

I'm not sure how they do their sums but they claim that the domestic violence figures - official government statistics, no less - used by White Ribbon Day organisers have been exaggerated by 400 per cent and that one in every three victims of domestic violence is a man.

There is no evidence provided by the Men's Rights Agency to back up this claim of one in three, unless by domestic violence they are also counting psychological violence of the "For

God's sake, honey, will you stop watching the footy and just mow the bloody lawn" variety.

Their distortion of the stats is one thing. However, if they want to suggest that 33.3 per cent of domestic violence victims are called Nige and Bazza, and are hiding in the broom cupboard begging for mercy as the little lady gives them the rounds of the kitchen, sensible people will see it for the crock that it is.

But their continuing attempts to win a cheap headline and deter government from financing childhood education projects through White Ribbon Day should be deplored.

Parents are reporting their concerns when their sons come home wearing the WR wristband and then begin asking questions, which suggest the boys fear their future will be one of violence, the Men's Rights Agency said this week.

The MRA says there is no excuse for the intrusion of the White Ribbon message into our schools, particularly with their brand of over-exaggeration

of male violence and denial of violence by females.

Setting aside the fact that there's no such thing as an over-exaggeration, it would be nice if the Men's Rights people could line up this army of angry families who are appalled by this innocent educational gesture and, while they're at it, maybe they can also wheel out those long-suffering men for whom home is a place of terror.

Otherwise, we should just recognise it for the cant that it is.

David Penberthy is editor of The Punch website and a former editor of the Daily Telegraph newspaper

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/white-ribbon-day-in-forums-sight/story-e6frfhqf-1225803968252

Men's Rights ~ Feminism should be about equality--for males too.

Commentary

Cathy Young, 11.19.09, 10:30 AM ET

Earlier this month DoubleX, Slate's short-lived female-oriented publication (launched six months ago and about to be folded back into the parent site as a women's section), ran an article ringing the alarm about the dire threat posed by the power of the men's rights movement. But the article, written by New York-based freelance writer Kathryn Joyce and titled "Men's Rights' Groups Have Become Frighteningly Effective," says more about the state of feminism--and journalistic bias--than it does about men's groups.

Joyce's indictment is directed at a loose network of activists seeking to raise awareness and change policy on such issues as false accusations of domestic violence, the plight of divorced fathers denied access to children and domestic abuse of men. In her view, groups such as RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting) and individuals like columnist and radio talk show host Glenn Sacks are merely "respectable" and "savvy" faces for what is actually an anti-female backlash from "angry white men."

As proof of this underlying misogyny, Joyce asserts that men who commit "acts of violence perceived to be in opposition to a feminist status quo" are routinely lionized in the men's movement. This claim is purportedly backed up with a reference that, in fact, does not in any way support it: an article in Foreign Policy about the decline of male dominance around the globe. Joyce's one specific example is that the diary of George Sodini, a Pittsburgh man who opened fire on women in a gym in retaliation for feeling rejected by women, was reposted online by the blogger "Angry Harry" as a wake-up call to the Western world that "it cannot continue to treat men so appallingly and get away with it." But does this have anything to do with more mainstream men's rights groups? The original version of the article claimed that Sacks, who called "Harry" an "idiot" in his interview with Joyce, nonetheless "cautiously defends" the blogger; DoubleX later ran a correction on this point.

Sacks himself admits to Joyce that the men's movement has a "not-insubstantial lunatic fringe." Yet in her eyes, even the mainstream men's groups are promoting a dangerous agenda, above all infiltrating mainstream opinion with the view that reports of domestic violence are exaggerated and that a lot of spousal abuse is female-perpetrated. The latter claim, Joyce asserts, comes from "a small group of social scientists" led by "sociologist Murray Straus of the University of New Hampshire, who has written extensively on female violence." (In fact, Straus, founder of the renowned Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire, is a pre-eminent scholar on family violence in general and was the first to conduct national surveys on the prevalence of wife-beating.)

Joyce repeats common critiques of Straus' research: For instance, he equates "a woman pushing a man in self-defense to a man pushing a woman down the stairs" or "a single act of female violence with years of male abuse." Yet these charges have been long refuted: Straus' studies measure the frequency of violence and specifically inquire about which partner initiated the physical violence. Furthermore, Joyce fails to mention that virtually all social scientists studying domestic violence, including self-identified feminists such as University of Pittsburgh psychologist Irene Frieze, find high rates of mutual aggression.

Reviews of hundreds of existing studies, such as one conducted by University of Central Lancashire psychologist John Archer in a 2000 article in Psychological Bulletin, have found that at least in Western countries, women are as likely to initiate partner violence as men. While the consequences to women are more severe--they are twice as likely to report injuries and about three times more likely to fear an abusive spouse--these findings also show that men hardly escape unscathed. Joyce claims that "Straus' research is starting to move public opinion," but in fact, some of the strongest recent challenges to the conventional feminist view of domestic violence--as almost invariably involving female victims and male batterers--come from female scholars like New York University psychologist Linda Mills.

Contrary to Joyce's claims, these challenges, so far, have made very limited inroads into public opinion. One of her examples of the scary power of men's rights groups is that "a Los Angeles conference this July dedicated to discussing male victims of domestic violence, 'From Ideology to Inclusion 2009: New Directions in Domestic Violence Research and Intervention,' received positive mainstream press for its 'inclusive' efforts.'" In fact, the conference--which featured leading researchers on domestic violence from several countries, half of them women, and focused on much more than just male victims--received virtually no mainstream press coverage. One of the very few exceptions was a column I wrote for The Boston Globe, also reprinted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Whatever minor successes men's groups may have achieved, the reality is that public policy on domestic violence in the U.S. is heavily dominated by feminist advocacy groups. For the most part, these groups embrace a rigid orthodoxy that treats domestic violence as male terrorism against women, rooted in patriarchal power and intended to enforce it. They also have a record of making grotesquely exaggerated, thoroughly debunked claims about an epidemic of violence against women--for instance, that battering causes more hospital visits by women every year than car accidents, muggings and cancer combined.

These advocacy groups practically designed the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, and they dominate the state coalitions against domestic violence to which local domestic violence programs must belong in order to qualify for federal funds. As a result of the advocates' influence, federal assistance is denied to programs that offer joint counseling to couples in which there is domestic violence, and court-mandated treatment for violent men downplays drug and alcohol abuse (since it's all about the patriarchy).

Against the backdrop of this enforced party line, Joyce is alarmed by the smallest signs that men's rights groups may be gaining even a modest voice in framing domestic violence policy. She points out that in a few states, men's rights activists have succeeded in "criminalizing false claims of domestic violence in custody cases" (this is apparently meant to be a bad thing) and "winning rulings that women-only shelters are discriminatory" (in fact, the California Court of Appeals ruled last year that state-funded domestic violence programs that refuse to provide service to abused men violate constitutional guarantees of equal protection, but also emphasized that the services need not be identical and coed shelters are not required).

To bolster her case, Joyce consistently quotes advocates--or scholars explicitly allied with the advocacy movement, such as Edward Gondolf of the Mid-Atlantic Addiction Research and Training Institute--to discredit the claims of the men's movement. She also repeats uncorroborated allegations that many leaders of the movement are themselves abusers, but offers only one specific example: eccentric British activist Jason Hatch, who once scaled Buckingham Palace in a Batman costume to protest injustices against fathers, and who was taken to court for allegedly threatening one of his ex-wives during a custody dispute.

The article is laced with the presumption that, with regard to both general data and individual cases, any charge of domestic violence made by a woman against a man must be true.

One case Joyce uses to illustrate her thesis is that of Genia Shockome, who claimed to have been severely battered by her ex-husband Tim and lost custody of her two children after being accused of intentionally alienating them from their father. Yet Joyce never mentions that Shockome's claims of violent abuse were unsupported by any evidence, that she herself did not mention any abuse in her initial divorce complaint, or that three custody evaluators--including a feminist psychologist who had worked with the Battered Women's Justice Center at Pace University--sided with the father.

More than a quarter-century ago, British feminist philosopher Janet Radcliffe Richards wrote, "No feminist whose concern for women stems from a concern for justice in general can ever legitimately allow her only interest to be the advantage of women." Joyce's article is a stark example of feminism as exclusive concern with women and their perceived advantage, rather than justice or truth.

Cathy Young, a contributing editor at Reason magazine and columnist for RealClearPolitics.com, is the author of Ceasefire: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality. She blogs at www.cathyyoung.wordpress.com.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/19/mens-rights-feminism-equality-violence-opinions-contributors-cathy-young.html

Fathers 4 Justice to protest at cathedral

Share with :	Close
del.icio.us	Digg
Facebook	reddit
StumbleUpon	Twitter

A Fathers for Justice group will be demonstrating at Canterbury Cathedral as part of their campaign to change family law.

New Fathers for Justice are urging all dads who will not be able to see their children this Christmas to join them at 10am on Saturday, December 12 to support their campaign.

The group will be dressed in Santa costumes to put pressure on the church to help them “put the father back into Christmas”.

A spokesman for the group said: “New Fathers for Justice will yet again attempt to get our message across to the church which, like this arrogant Labour government, had ignored the plight of fathers since they have been in office.

“We are urging the church to support us in our fight to change family law and plug dads back into families in time for Christmas.

“We see this as a great necessity as we are now potentially only six months away from the general election. We hope that the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams will help us with the plight of dads in Britain this Christmas.”

The group has urged dads to come along with banners and wearing Father Christmas outfits.

Campaigners from father’s rights groups have made a name for themselves using direct action campaigning methods to fight for better rights for fathers who want to see their children.

High profile demonstrations include a campaigner dressed as Batman staging a five-hour protest on a Buckingham Palace ledge and a father dressed as Spiderman protesting on the London Eye for 18 hours, causing it to close.

POSTED: 24/11/2009 11:30:00

http://www.yourcanterbury.co.uk/kent-news/Fathers-4-Justice-to-protest-at-cathedral-newsinkent30341.aspx

The Cyber Stalkers from OZ are back again with their not so secret - secret service

The fringe lunatic group called anonymums are up to their old games again with a new hate site but they are now going beyond the bounds of their other dim bulb men's hate sites and into the realm of criminal hate and civil libel. I have sent the following off to the Australian Federal Police, the ISP of the cyber stalker from Melbourne in OZ, shown below and will follow up with a legal letter to Wordpress the owners of the blogs. They believe they are anonymous and they are playing "secret service" games.

We'll see how secret they are over the next little while.MJM

From: Mike Murphy
Date: 2009/11/22
Subject: Australian Federal Police - Melbourne Office ~ Potential OZ Cyber stalkers - possibly from a fringe radical female group called anonymums
To: MEL-OMC@afp.gov.au


A Cyber Stalker using IP # 58.165.25.47 and Host name CPE-58-165-25-47.vic.bigpond.net.au on November 21, 2009 visited 3 of my blogs spending a great deal of time compiling information. This is, I believe, a female who belongs to a group on the lunatic fringe of mothers who have lost custody of their children and some of whom have serious personality disorders based on the hate sites against men they operate. They use the information leeched from other blogs and web pages on sites they create using Wordpress and Blogspot blogging interfaces. One of many was recently created to publish libelous material that has criminal overtones. The location of the new one is here http://mothersintelligencesecretservice.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/dossier-mike-j-murphy/ and the information on me was posted today.

These are some of the sites they operate directly or are associated with. http://anonymums.blogspot.com/.../justice-nicholson-wants-to-silence.html
http://ozpigpage.blogspot.com/, http://thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com/ - this one is used to slime men as well. In addition they are associated with similar women in the USA and Canada.

This cyber stalker has used Telstra International services to do this to other men on this same site and on other sites. Information on the IP and computer identity is included in the attachment and below.

The attached PDF has all the pertinent information to trace her. I have notified Telstra of my concerns shown below. It is my belief the person doing this may be suffering from a serious personality disorder and it is of concern. Please note one of the people this woman has slandered is an American Judge and I will forward my information to him in case he wishes to have the FBI investigate. My complete contact info is in the attachment and you should, under no circumstances, release this to the stalker.

Make A Complaint

Your email has been successfully submitted.

The details you submitted are as follows:

Date: 23/11/2009

Time: 15:28

Name: Mike Murphy

Message: A Cyber Stalker using IP # 58.165.25.47 and Host name CPE-58-165-25-47.vic.bigpond.net.au on November 21, 2009 visited 3 of my blogs spending a great deal of time compiling information. This is likely a female who has a serious personaity disorder and uses the information on a site recently created to publish libelous material. The location is here http://mothersintelligencesecretservice.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/dossier-mike-j-murphy/ and the information on me was posted today.

This cyber stalker has used your services to do this to other men on this same site and on other sites.

I have attached a PDF with the pertinent information. It is my belief the person doing this may be suffering from a serious personality disorder and it is of concern. Please note one of the people this woman has slandered is an American Judge and I will forward my information to him in case he wishes to have the FBI investigate. My complete contact info is in the attachment and you should, under no circumstances, release this to the stalker.

I will also be forwarding this information to the Australian Federal Police at their Melbourne office MEL-OMC@afp.gov.au

Telstra Customer Group: Residential

Telephone Number:

Email Address: mjmurphy@nospam.com

Potential OZ Cyber stalkers

3 Blog Logs of visit.

Possibly mentally ill and a member of a group called anonymums from OZ

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer	http://www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503
Host Name	November 21, 2009
IP Address	58.165.25.47 stalker [Edit Label]
Country	Australia
Region	Victoria
City	Melbourne
ISP	Telstra Internet
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	2 hours 58 mins 1 sec
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	Safari 4.0
Operating System	WinXP
Resolution	1152x864
Javascript	Enabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	Type	WebPage
21st November 2009	19:39:18	Page View	www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503 f4j-soo.blogspot.com/
21st November 2009	21:31:15	Page View	www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22michael j Murphy%22 %22Parental alienation%22&start=10&sa=N f4j-soo.blogspot.com/2009/04/executive-summary-child-custody-access.html
21st November 2009	22:29:24	Page View	No referring link f4j-soo.blogspot.com/2008/09/edmonton-sun-when-dad-is-just-bad.html
21st November 2009	22:32:38	Exit Link	http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Columnists/Jacobs_Mindelle/2008/09/10/6717881-sun.html
21st November 2009	22:37:19	Page View	www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Mike Murphy%22 feminazi&aq=f&oq=&aqi= f4j-soo.blogspot.com/2008/09/followup-on-feminazi-report.html

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer	http://www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503
Host Name	CPE-58-165-25-47.vic.bigpond.net.au
IP Address	58.165.25.47 stalker [Edit Label]
Country	Australia
Region	Victoria
City	Melbourne
ISP	Telstra Internet
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	4 hours 53 mins 1 sec
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	Safari 4.0
Operating System	WinXP
Resolution	1152x864
Javascript	Enabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	Type	WebPage
21st November 2009	19:37:13	Page View	www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/
21st November 2009	19:37:26	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/ fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1
21st November 2009	19:37:43	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1996-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1
21st November 2009	19:37:50	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1996-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2000-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1
21st November 2009	19:38:03	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2000-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=3
21st November 2009	19:38:42	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=3 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2004-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=2
21st November 2009	19:38:57	Page View	fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1996-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2000-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1
21st November 2009	21:48:23	Page View	www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22When his ex-wife accused him of abuse, stay-at-home dad Mike Murphy%22&start=10&sa=N&filter=0 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/2009/04/sault-star-fathers-4-justice-sets-up.html
21st November 2009	21:49:37	Page View	www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22When his ex-wife accused him of abuse, stay-at-home dad Mike Murphy%22&start=10&sa=N&filter=0 fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/2009/04/sault-star-fathers-4-justice-sets-up.html
21st November 2009	21:50:23	Exit Link	http://www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503
21st November 2009	21:50:40	Exit Link	http://www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503
22nd November 2009	00:30:14	Page View	No referring link fathersmensrights.blogspot.com/2009/04/sault-star-fathers-4-justice-sets-up.html

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referring Link	http://livepremiumcontent.s3.amazonaws.com/8711bdd9d5120883865fb845eba5e3b8/index.htm
Host Name	CPE-58-165-25-47.vic.bigpond.net.au
IP Address	58.165.25.47 stalker [Edit Label]
Country	Australia
Region	Victoria
City	Melbourne
ISP	Telstrainternet42
Returning Visits	0
Visit Length	3 hours 10 mins 25 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser	Safari 4.0.3
Operating System	Windows XP
Resolution	1152x864
Javascript	Enabled

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage
21st November 2009	19:35:49	livepremiumcontent.s3.amazonaws.com/8711bdd9d5120883865fb845eba5e3b8/index.htm parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2009/10/caroline-overington-in-oz-out-does.html
21st November 2009	19:36:29	www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22mike Murphy%22 alienation&start=0&sa=N parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/
21st November 2009	19:39:48	www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/
21st November 2009	19:40:03	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/ parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1991-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1992-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:40:15	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1991-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1992-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:40:29	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:40:35	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1994-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1995-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1996-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:40:47	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1996-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1998-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:40:52	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1997-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1998-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1998-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:41:09	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1998-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2000-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:41:19	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=1999-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2000-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2001-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:41:40	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2001-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:41:49	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2002-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=2 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2004-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	19:42:47	parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2003-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2004-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=1 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2004-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2005-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-result
21st November 2009	20:18:44	No referring link parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2009/11/feminist-hatred-compendium-of-with.html
21st November 2009	20:18:59	No referring link parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2009/11/fathers-4-equalityin-oz-investigative.html
21st November 2009	21:32:47	www.spokeo.com/user parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2008_09_05_archive.html
21st November 2009	22:12:04	www.blogger.com/profile/01576687584409641503 parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/
21st November 2009	22:46:14	www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Mike Murphy%22 feminazi&start=30&sa=N parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2009/01/antonia-zerbisias-note-from-management.html